Our date with destiny: September 23 - Part 3

The comment by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, “We have only 500 days away from Climate Chaos,” is rather strange since 500 days from that date is September 23. Although it could easily have been just a general statement, I base odds on the overall September 23 phenomenon. “Oh that’s nothing” could not work in a court of law if enough clues and facts pointed to a clear pattern. The rolling of the dice can only come up with “snake eyes” so many times until one should know that they’re fixed.

An asteroid hitting the Gulf of Mexico in September is partly based on “leaks,” which means that it’s either true or a deliberate attempt to mislead. Also, misinformation could be used to mask over perhaps something else that may happen. However, there are a few more clues that make this scenario more gripping. Using Bible prophesy and mathematics, Isaac Newton concluded that there is a 100% probability of an asteroid hitting the earth on September 23 and/or 24, 2015. The ‘Book of Enoch’ has a prophesy of an asteroid hitting the earth at about this time. There are also “Bible codes” which point to an asteroid as well, but I think the Newton prophesy would be the one to look up. While “leaks” are neither here nor there, one such leak was that it is a two and a half mile wide comet, not an asteroid, that will crash about 200 miles off the coast of Brazil and Venezuela between September 15 and 28.

One would have to base much of their opinion on what point of view(s) their coming from. Even if you don’t believe a prophesy for example, someone could still engineer something to happened based on their own beliefs. I’m not fully convinced of CERN’s denials, but I’m neither fully convinced that this is some type of modern “Tower of Babble” happening. There are more tie-ins and coincidences involved than I could jot down in limited time. Personally, I would like to see October 1st without happening. The fact that even a mainstreamer like Stephen Hawking is concerned gives some serious doubt as to whether or not CERN is being totally honest, or that they're not opening up some sort of dangerous oracle.


Clearly many of these elites are heavily into overt and unimpressive eclectic occultism, transhumanism, and their own brand(s) of personal and collective egos. Much of the symbology is so deep that I can barely grasp the breadth of it. With the pre-911 symbolism, it wasn't anything that anyone would have understood; while with 2012 and Y2K non-events, there wasn’t any sort of real codex involved. Here it’s such a telegraphed blow that I can’t imagine anything major happening. For example, if an asteroid did create an unprecedented disaster with hundreds of thousands of deaths, then Laurent Fabius and many others should be held accountable since they would have obviously known about it in advance—to the day!—and only managed to muddle something obscure about it.

Hollywood has been all over this for many years. Every combination of “923” imaginable. Clocks, timers, signs, signals, vocal references, etc., that it couldn’t be mere chance. ‘The Simpsons’ and ‘Family Guy’ are obvious examples of this “predictive programming. However in a couple of dozen Hollywood movies going back about twenty years, the “923” symbolism was used. In the recent tv series ‘Fringe’, there is a whole scenario that is a mirror of CERN, September 23, and the collider, and a clear malevolent nature is portrayed. On top of many “923” symbols used in 'Fringe', there was one point where a clock showed “9:23” and right afterward a timer showed the reverse “329.” It’s rather unlikely that this is mere coincidence. The upcoming movie ‘The Walk’ seems to have some eery symbolic connections, but that’s something to look up yourself, as it’s sufficiently bizarre and paranoid enough that it may even seem unbelievable if I would to break that down here now. In a 1996 episode of the tv program ‘3^rd Rock from the Sun,’ the actor John Lithgow played a high school teacher who loudly proclaimed to his class in regards to people focusing on the unimportant… “Blissfully unaware of the great vaporizing meteor due in 2015!” Again, it’s the totality of the clues that could make the free and critical thinker feel a bit uneasy.

If you’re curious about the “923 phenomenon,” a few names to search are Anthony Patch, Tom Horn, Jonathan Cahn, and Steve Quayle. One theme that follows along the lines of something covered on this blog is that, while the collider is attempting to recreate conditions of the Big Bang Theory officially, some believe that it may end up validating the Electric Universe theory. Today, “critic” usually just means “mainstream.” One who just denies anything that he didn’t read, see, or hear in the mainstream media. A “critical mind” used to be a good thing because it validates truth. Any good free and critical thinker should try to determine the difference between established facts and patterns and unsubstantiated talk or rumors; and the difference between logical thought and perception. For example, some believe that the Pope’s visit to America on September 23 , 2015 will coincide with his “admitting the arrival of aliens"… perhaps to cover up the coming Rapture Event (actually the Vatican does talk about “aliens” on occasion).

Personally, I think the Pope visiting on September 23 is the fact that ties into the codex, and not aliens or rapture. I extract only the facts that fit the emerging pattern. When reading CERN's denials, my rational mind was accepting their assurances, until one response came up that I knew wasn't true.. which then reshuffles the deck a bit for me. It's like a grand puzzle which can only be played by someone who thinks a bit like an old-school critic; and not a conformist, a single-issue zealot, a critical naysayer, or the gullible.

.

Papal Bull of 1455

Papal Bull of 1455:

...Champions of the Christian Faith...

to invade, search out, capture, vanquish and subdue all Saracens and Pagans whatsoever and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery...

The struggle of Christian and Saracen was one of which both sides played the roles of both perpetrator and victim. In other words, the Muslims of those times committed the same type of aggression as above. However, with the Pagans--or "native believers" (those who believed in the spirituality of their ancestors--the socio-political/religious dynamic was very different. These were not people from some foreign land, but those who adhered to the pre-Christian ways of at least 40,000 years of history.

.

Catholic Church Issues Guide on How to Convert Witches

Since when is it the job of a religion to convert members of another religion... as a matter of organizational policy!? Every religion has the right to recruit members from society at large, but the Vatican is now opening up old wounds by literally targeting a religious demographic that they used to simply murder off.

The Vatican doesn't seem the least bit concerned with tens of millions of Muslims migrating into Europe with no end in sight; not to mention the fact that Catholicism, and Christianity at large, has become a comparatively weak social construct in the UK in particular. Apparently, they're too preoccupied with a very small number of practitioners of native paganism, or what they refer to as "witchcraft." Apparently "priestcraft" is okay. If this action was targeting one the larger religions, then people would call it "hate," but if it's a smaller relgion, then it's okay under the current paradigm.

The Vatican is a sovereign state which oversees the worldwide Catholic Church; as well as a massive, MASSIVE, global banking conglomerate. Why are they concerned with a few people chanting in a forest clearing, who aren't even bothering anyone? Now when we add in the factor of the Vatican's historic systematic murder of any religion which wasn't Catholic (Waldensians, Cathars, Pagans, etc.), this action by the Vatican is nothing short of crazy. If there were pagans somewhere, antagonizing Christians, then that would merit a similar response; but lets face it, what we have here is an ant versus an elephant.

The Camonica Club of North America, descendants of the Val Camonica witch trials brought upon by the Vatican in the sixteenth century, condemns the Vatican's pamphlet entitled 'Wicca and Witchcraft: Understanding the Dangers', and calls for them to simply leave these peaceful people alone. Whatever fault could be found among an absolutely minuscule number of pagans is a drop in the bucket compared to the very serious problems of a much larger number of trusted Catholic officials worldwide in recent years; not to mention the Vatican's terribly destructive proxy actions in Croatia not so many years ago.

Catholic Church Issues Guide on How to Convert Witches

Theunis Bates - AolNews - February 4, 2011

LONDON -- Five hundred years ago, the Catholic Church had a simple way of dealing with witches: It burned them alive. The Vatican still views these broom botherers as a danger, but is now calling on Catholics to eliminate the neo-pagan problem in a more moderate manner.

According to a new booklet from the Catholic Truth Society -- the U.K. publishers for the Holy See -- the faithful can convert Wiccans by following a few simple steps. The pamphlet, titled "Wicca and Witchcraft: Understanding the Dangers," suggests that Catholics spark up conversations with these unbelievers about shared concerns such as the environment, The Telegraph reports.

And if you bump into a witch in a bar or coffee shop, the book adds, it's important to recognize that "Wiccans are on a genuine spiritual quest," providing "the starting point for dialog that may lead to their conversion."

The booklet's author, former Wiccan Elizabeth Dodd, states that nearly 70 percent of people indulging in witchcraft are young women seeking some kind of spirituality, according to the Daily Mail. The source of that statistic isn't clear, but some 7,000 Brits identified themselves as Wiccans in the 2001 census.

So why does the Vatican once again feel that it needs to confront pagan practitioners? The Daily Mail says that the church is afraid the dark arts are becoming ever more tempting thanks to the success of Harry Potter. Dodd says that any youngster who dabbles in magic risks long-term problems.

"Whether spellwork is effective or not," writes Dodd, according to The Telegraph, "has no bearing on the psychological damage that can be done to a young person who is convinced that they have summoned the dead, or have performed a spell that has hurt or injured another."

More important, Dodd adds that the simple act of experimenting with spellcraft is an insult to the Almighty. "The use of magic, the practice of witchcraft, offends God because it is rooted in our sinful and fallen nature," she writes. "It attempts to usurp God."

While many religious and nonreligious folk might regard Dodd's message as extreme, her point has clearly been heeded by some Catholics. As of this morning, the pamphlet was listed as sold-out on Amazon.co.uk.

.